Computer Programs and Systems, Inc. et al v. Wazu Holdings, Inc. et al
| Computer Programs and Systems, Inc. and Evident, LLC |
| Wazu Holdings, Inc. and Evident, Inc. |
| 1:2015cv00405 |
| August 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| Kristi K. DuBose |
| Bert W. Milling |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
348
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 340 Motion to Retax. The costs are RETAXED in the amount of $34,948.63 in favor of CPSI, as detailed herein. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 03/11/2019. (nah)
|
|
Filing
154
Order granting in part and denying in part 117 MOTION to Compel filed by Computer Programs and Systems, Inc., and 118 Second MOTION to Compel Discovery filed by Evident, Inc., Wazu Holdings, Ltd. as set out herein. Parties are ordered to notify Court in writing whether the exchange of information resulted in a resolution and the status of the outstanding discovery dispute by no later than 7/3/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 6/26/2017. (srd)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER denying 75 Motion to Bifurcate as to discovery. Plaintiffs' request to bifurcate trial is denied at this time. However, Plaintiff may re-file the motion to bifurcate trial after the close of discovery and the resolution of any motions for summary judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 3/7/2017. (cmj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
