PNC Bank v. Classic Crab, Inc. et al
| PNC Bank |
| Classic Crab, Inc. and Daryl B. Bryant |
| 1:2015cv00459 |
| September 18, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| Kristi K. DuBose |
| William E. Cassady |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER granting 31 Motion for Summary Judgment against the Defendant Daryl Bryant in the amount of $241,661.54, which is comprised of the guaranteed debt of $230,263.24, $6,637.05 in additionally accrued interest, and $4,761.25 in attorneys fees. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 8/11/2016. (srd)
|
|
Filing
29
JUDGMENT in favor of PNC Bank against Classic Crab, Inc. in the amount of $230,263.24. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 6/6/2016. (copy mailed to Daryl Bryant) (cmj)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 25 Motion for Default Judgment as follows: Granted as to its claim for breach of promissory note, but with leave to supplement as to its request for attorney's fees; and denied as to its request fo r future accruals of court costs. Plaintiff shall supplement its motion as directed above on or before 4/28/16. The court will then assess the full amount of damages due to PNC due to Classic Crab's breach of the promissory note, and issue a separate order any any appropriate judgment as to the same.. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 4/18/2016. (copy mailed to Bryant) (cmj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
