Buford v. City Of Mobile et al
Lewis Bay Buford, Jr. |
City Of Mobile, Sherman E. Otis, Richard Doe, James Doe, Leroy Raine and Karen Raine |
1:2015cv00553 |
October 30, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Mobile Office |
Mobile |
William E. Cassady |
Charles R. Butler |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 Order WITHDRAWING 33 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Sherman E. Otis; WITHDRAWING 34 MOTION to Dismiss filed by City Of Mobile. The plaintiff agreed to the WITHDRAWAL of Counts 5, 6, and 7 set forth in his first amended complaint and those counts are STRICKEN from the first amended complaint. The plaintiff agreed to the striking of the City of Mobile with respect to Counts 8, 9, 10, 15 and 16 of the first amended complaint. Finding as MOOT 35 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages filed by Lewis Bay Buford, Jr.; Amended Pleadings due by 8/12/2016. Discovery cutoff 7/29/2016. Motions due by 8/26/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 4/29/2016. copies to parties. (sdb) |
Filing 12 Order denying 11 Amended MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Lewis Bay Buford, Jr..; Terminating 2 Motion to Remand. If Plaintiff intends to dismiss his claims against the Raines without prejudice and proceed on the proposed amended complaint he must notify the Court in writing by 12/10/2015. Signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Butler, Jr on 11/30/2015. copies to parties. (sdb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.