Precision IBC, Inc. v. Phoenix Chemical Technologies, LLC et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Alabama Southern District Precision IBC, Inc. v. Phoenix Chemical Technologies, LLC et al

Precision IBC, Inc. v. Phoenix Chemical Technologies, LLC et al

Plaintiff:	Precision IBC, Inc.
Defendant:	Phoenix Chemical Technologies, LLC
Case Number:	1:2015cv00637
Filed:	December 16, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Office:	Mobile Office
County:	Mobile
Presiding Judge:	William E. Cassady
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 19, 2017	Filing 62 JUDGMENT entered in accordance with the memorandum opinion and order entered on March 28, 2017 (Doc. 58) in favor of Precision IBC, Inc. against Phoenix Chemical Technologies, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 4/19/2017. (eec)
March 28, 2017	Filing 58 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER entered. The Court finds that Precision's motion for summary judgment is due to be and hereby is GRANTED. Further, the Court finds that Precision's motion seeking to enforce the Court's December 1, 2016 Order is due to be and hereby is GRANTED. The attorney's fees previously awarded to Precision will be included in the final judgment entered against Phoenix. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 3/28/2017. (eec)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 19, 2017

Filing 62 JUDGMENT entered in accordance with the memorandum opinion and order entered on March 28, 2017 (Doc. 58) in favor of Precision IBC, Inc. against Phoenix Chemical Technologies, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 4/19/2017. (eec)

March 28, 2017

Filing 58 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER entered. The Court finds that Precision's motion for summary judgment is due to be and hereby is GRANTED. Further, the Court finds that Precision's motion seeking to enforce the Court's December 1, 2016 Order is due to be and hereby is GRANTED. The attorney's fees previously awarded to Precision will be included in the final judgment entered against Phoenix. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 3/28/2017. (eec)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Precision IBC, Inc. v. Phoenix Chemical Technologies, LLC et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Precision IBC, Inc.
Represented By:	Anne Laurie McClurkin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Phoenix Chemical Technologies, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?