Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC v. Converteam SAS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 3, 2017
ORDER granting 62 Motion to Compel Arbitration and the claims of the Insurers are referred for arbitration in accordance with the terms of the Supply Agreements. Accordingly, GE's motion to dismiss is granted and the Clerk is directed to close this action. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 2/3/2017. (cmj)
|January 30, 2017
ORDER denying 58 Motion to Supplement; granting 6 Motion to Compel Arbitration. Accordingly OTK, Sompo and GE are referred for arbitration in accordance with the terms of the Supply Agreements. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is Granted. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 1/30/2017. (cmj)
|December 22, 2016
ORDER ADOPTING 50 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Converteam SAS, 34 MOTION to Remand filed by AXA Corporate Solutions Assurance SA UK Branch, Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America, HDI Ger ling UK Branch, Tapiola General Mutual Insurance Company, MSI Corporate Capital Ltd, AIG Europe Limited, Royal & Sun Alliance PLC, Pohjola Insurance Limited, and 35 MOTION to Remand to State Court or, in the Alternative, Motion for Lea ve to Take Limited Discovery Regarding the Alleged "Agreement for Consortial Cooperation" and Incorporated Supporting Brief filed by Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC. The Motions to Remand (34 & 35) are denied and the Motion to Dismiss (7) is denied. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 12/22/2016. (cmj)
|August 10, 2016
ORDER denying 15 the motion to stay briefing and consideration of the Defendants pending motions. The Court will extend to plaintiffs the opportunity to file replies to the defendants responses in opposition to the motions to remand/replies in support of the pending motions due by 9/7/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 8/10/2016. (srd)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?