United States of America v. Approximately $299,873.70 seized from a Bank of America Account et al
| United States of America |
| Approximately $299,873.70 seized from a Bank of America Account, Approximately $191,260.60 seized from a Bank of America Account, Approximately $299,945.00 seized from an East West Bank Account, Approximately $299,970.00 seized from an East West Bank Account, Approximately $249,927.14 seized from an East West Bank Account, Approximately $297,110.00 seized from an East West Bank Account, Approximately $278,952.11 seized from an East West Bank Account, Approximately $12,367.82 seized from an East West Bank Account, Approximately $249,816.00 seized from an East West Bank Account, Approximately $281,110.00 seized from an East West Bank Account, Approximately $299,985.00 seized from a J.P. Morgan Chase Account, Approximately $299,852.00 seized from a J.P. Morgan Chase Account, Approximately $76,604.55 seized from a J.P. Morgan Chase Account, Approximately $300,000.00 seized from a J.P. Morgan Chase Account, Approximately $299,983.49 seized from a J.P. Morgan Chase Account, Approximately $199,907.52 seized from a J.P. Morgan Chase Account, Approximately $149,759.17 seized from a J.P. Morgan Chase Account and Approximately $299,000.00 seized from a J.P. Morgan Chase Account |
| 1:2016cv00545 |
| October 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| Callie V. S. Granade |
| Katherine P. Nelson |
| Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 981 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
355
ORDER granting the Motions for Relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465 ofthe Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act (CAFRA) (docs. 291, 292, 295, 296, 297, 328). The Claimants respective motions for return of property included in the motions are MOOT. T he 350 Motion to Amend is GRANTED. Pre-judgment interest and post-judgment interest are awarded to the Claimants and the Court finds that the United States is liable to the Claimants for attorney's fees and costs, as set out. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 8/17/2020. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
290
Order DENYING 271 MOTION to Set Aside Default Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 01/30/2020. (nah)
|
|
Filing
288
Order DENYING Claimants' 269 MOTION for New Trial RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, REQUEST FOR A NEW TRIAL, 272 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Or in Alternative For New Trial , and 273 Supplemental MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law SUPPLEMENT TO CLAIMANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A NEW TRIAL as set out. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 01/22/2020. (nah)
|
|
Filing
258
ORDER denying 232 Motion to Dismiss; denying 244 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 10/14/2019. (khc)
|
|
Filing
251
ORDER denying at this time 216 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 217 Motion in Limine; granting 218 Motion in Limine; Carrying to Trial 219 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 220 Motion in Limine. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 10/12/2019. (khc)
|
|
Filing
197
Default Judgment of Forfeiture entered as to Pan Qiang. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 06/06/2019. (nah)
|
|
Filing
190
Default Judgment of Forfeiture entered as to Zuowu Xie. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 04/12/2019. (nah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
