Floyd v. PEM Real Estate Group et al
| B. Renel Floyd |
| PEM Real Estate Group, Jude Reynolds, Kristi Ridlon, Macy Proulx and Josh Ashcraft |
| 1:2017cv00451 |
| October 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| Callie V. S. Granade |
| Katherine P. Nelson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
142
ORDER ADOPTING 141 Report and Recommendation as modified; construing Plaintiff's 125 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal to be a motion to dismiss; GRANTING motion; and DISMISSING without prejudice all claim asserted by Plaintiff against Defendants. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 2/28/2020. (mab)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER ADOPTING 96 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and GRANTING 83 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by HW Investco, LLC as set out. Remainder of case is REFERRED back to Magistrate Judge. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 02/14/2019. (srd) (copy to Plt)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER ADOPTING 77 Report and Recommendation with AMENDMENT as set forth in Order. 47 Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Jude Reynolds is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 45 Motion to Dismiss filed by HW Investco Mobile is DENIED. Defendants Macy Proulx, Kristi Ridlon, and Josh Ashcraft's Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 39 , 41 , 43 ) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 09/13/2018. (mab)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
