Powell v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
Carissa Powell |
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Christopher Orstadt |
1:2018cv00018 |
January 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Mobile Office |
Baldwin |
Katherine P. Nelson |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 ORDER granting 29 Motion to Amend Complaint. Because complete diversity is now lacking, the plaintiff's motion to remand is granted. This action is remanded to the Circuit Court of Baldwin County. Signed by District Judge William H. Steele on 6/26/2018. (tgw) |
Filing 14 NOTICE AND ORDER that the Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the Motion to Dismiss 13 filed by Carissa Powell as an active motion (the Court is treating the motion as a notice of dismissal of all claims against defendant Orstadt) and is to terminate Orstadt as an active party to this action. MOTION to Dismiss 2 treated as a MOTION for Summary Judgment is MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 3/1/18. (srr) |
Filing 12 Order that the Court is treating the 2 MOTION to Dismiss and Incorporated Brief filed by Christopher Orstadt as a MOTION for Summary Judgment; Response to Motion due by 3/1/2018, Replies due by 3/15/2018, Motion to be taken under submission on 3/16/2018.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 2/1/18. (srr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.