Murey v. The City of Chickasaw Alabama et al
Plaintiff: Carlos Fernando Reixac Murey
Defendant: The City of Chickasaw Alabama, Michael E. Reynolds and C. Robinson
Case Number: 1:2018cv00275
Filed: June 15, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Office: Mobile Office
County: Mobile
Presiding Judge: Kristi K. DuBose
Presiding Judge: Katherine P. Nelson
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 143 Order re: 136 Reply filed by Carlos Fernando Reixac Murey. The Court finds sanctions are not warranted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Plaintiff's motion sanctions is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 11/26/2019. (nah)
November 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 140 ORDER granting 88 Motion for Summary Judgment on all claims, and Lens' wrongful death claim is dismissed without prejudice. A final judgment will be entered after the court addresses plaintiff's motion for sanctions. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 11/21/19. (cmj)
October 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 130 Order GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 122 MOTION for Discovery to be Reopened for Limited Purpose as set out. It is ORDERED that this limited discovery shall be completed on or before 11/1/2019; and the parties have leave of Court to file, on or before 11/8/2019, supplemental briefs as set out. The Court will take the summary judgment under submission upon receipt of the parties supplemental briefs on 11/8/2019. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 10/21/2019. (nah)
November 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER ADOPTING 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is ORDERED that 8 MOTION to Remand to State Court or MFE of Time to Allow Discovery by Carlos Fernando Reixac Murey, is DENIED as MOOT regarding Motion for Time to Conduct Discovery, and DENIED as to alternative Motion to Remand. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 11/08/2018. (nah)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Murey v. The City of Chickasaw Alabama et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos Fernando Reixac Murey
Represented By: Robert E. Rone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The City of Chickasaw Alabama
Represented By: Melissa P. Hunter
Represented By: Andrew John Rutens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael E. Reynolds
Represented By: Melissa P. Hunter
Represented By: Andrew John Rutens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. Robinson
Represented By: Melissa P. Hunter
Represented By: Andrew John Rutens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?