United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Master Marine, Inc.
| Master Marine, Inc. |
| United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| 1:2018cv00371 |
| August 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| William E Cassady |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Master Marine, Inc. waiver sent on 10/2/2018, answer due 12/3/2018. (Parker, Russell) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Suntrease Williams-Maynard on behalf of United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Williams-Maynard, Suntrease) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Gerald Lee Miller on behalf of United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Miller, Gerald) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Russell Paul Parker on behalf of United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Parker, Russell) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Assignment to Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady for trial. (eec) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Master Marine, Inc., filed by United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Rucker, Marsha) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/29/2018: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (eec). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
