Armstrong et al v. CSX Transportation Inc.
| Virgil Armstrong and Ann Neita Armstrong |
| CSX Transportation Inc. |
| 1:2018cv00409 |
| September 20, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Jeffrey U Beaverstock |
| Katherine P Nelson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 31
Order entered that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE subject to the right of either party to reinstate the action within 30 days should the settlement not be consummated. Signed by District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock on 10/9/2018. (tgw)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson: Status/Scheduling Conference held on 10/9/2018 DCR Digital Audio Recording. (srr) |
|
Filing 29
ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING & STATUS CONFERENCE for 10/9/2018 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 9/21/2018. (tgw)
|
| MOTIONS REFERRED: MOTION to Dismiss & Brief in Support (SEE DOCS. 18 & 25) - Referred to Judge Katherine P. Nelson. (tgw) |
| Filing 28 Case transferred in from Northern District of Alabama; Case Number 2:18-cv-856-JEO. Original file with documents numbered 1-27 received. (PDF IS BOOKMARKED). (tgw) |
| MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaim by Ann Neita Armstrong, Virgil Armstrong (ORIGINALLY FILED IN ALND AT DOC. 18). (tgw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
