Leach v. Wehling et al
| David Leach |
| Regents Bank, Mary Wehling and Ugene Wehling |
| 1:2018cv00454 |
| October 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Kristi K DuBose |
| Bert W Milling |
| Banks and Banking |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING ORDER entered. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/25/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bert W. Milling, Jr on 12/11/2018. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Copy mailed to Plaintiff and Defendants Mary & Ugene Wehling) (nah)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Mary Wehling. (nah) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Ugene Wehling. (nah) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Ugene Wehling served on 11/21/2018, answer due 12/12/2018 (nah) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Mary Wehling served on 11/21/2018, answer due 12/12/2018 (nah) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Regents Bank served on 11/29/2018, answer due 12/20/2018 (nah) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Regents Bank, Mary Wehling, Ugene Wehling. Summons mailed to Plaintiff for service. (nah) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Regents Bank, Mary Wehling, Ugene Wehling ( Filing fee $400 receipt number 46031048454, Paid at Intake), filed by David Leach. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Filing Fee Receipt) (nah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
