Austin v. Raybon et al
Plaintiff: Charles Austin
Defendant: Raybon, Jefferson Dunn, Ms. Kidd and Scarbraugh
Case Number: 1:2018cv00489
Filed: November 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey U Beaverstock
Referring Judge: Katherine P Nelson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE to the Court of mailing of Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Pleadings & Motion to Proceed IFP by Charles Austin - Ref to MJ/Nelson (PSU) (tgw)
January 14, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles Austin - Referred to Judge Katherine P. Nelson (PSU). (nah)
January 14, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION to Amend the Pleadings re #1 Complaint by Charles Austin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) - Referred to Judge Katherine P. Nelson (PSU). (nah)
January 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order re: #3 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is GRANTED an extension to file the motion to proceed without payment or pay the filing fee by 2/11/2019 as set out. Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff an IFP form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 01/10/2019. Copy of Order & IFP motion mailed to Plaintiff (srd)
November 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is granted leave to refile the motion by 12/28/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 11/28/2018. Copy of Order & IFP motion mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)
November 26, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles Austin - Referred to Judge Katherine P. Nelson (PSU) (tgw)
November 26, 2018 Filing 1 1983 COMPLAINT against Jefferson Dunn, Ms. Kidd, Raybon, Scarbraugh filed by Charles Austin - Ref to MJ/Nelson (PSU) (tgw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Austin v. Raybon et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raybon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jefferson Dunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ms. Kidd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scarbraugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Austin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?