Dixon v. Cooks
| Roger Dixon |
| Mary Cooks |
| 1:2019cv00026 |
| January 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Katherine P Nelson |
| William H Steele |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Order REDIRECTING Petitioner to complete and file a 2254 Petition on the Court's form no later than 3/27/2019 as set out. Petitioner is also ORDERED to file a separate Response by 3/27/2019 showing good cause for his failure to comply with Court's initial deadline. Clerk is DIRECTED to send a 2254 form to Petitioner. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 03/06/2019. (srd) (1) 2254 Form) (srd).
|
|
Filing 5
Order directing Plaintiff to file this Court's form by 2/28/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 1/29/2019. (Attachments: #1 2254 Habeas Form) (tgw)
|
| REFERRAL OF #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus to Judge Nelson (PSU). (tgw) |
| Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Alabama Middle; Case Number 2:18-cv-01045. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 3
ORDER (1) ADOPTING #2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge; (2) this case is TRANSFERRED to the US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama under 28 USC 1631; directing the clerk to take appropriate steps to effect the transfer; this case is closed in this court. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 1/22/19. (djy, ) [Transferred from Alabama Middle on 1/22/2019.]
|
| Case transferred to Southern District of Alabama. Electronically transferred via CM/ECF transfer to Clerk. (djy, ) [Transferred from Alabama Middle on 1/22/2019.] |
| No objections to #2 report and recommendation (NO PDF document attached to this notice). (djy, ) [Transferred from Alabama Middle on 1/22/2019.] |
| Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case be TRANSFERRED to the US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama under 28 USC 1631; Objections to R&R due by 1/2/2019. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 12/18/18. (djy, ) [Transferred from Alabama Middle on 1/22/2019.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number 4602051765.), filed by Roger Dixon. (Attachments: #1 Filing Fee)(es, ) [Transferred from Alabama Middle on 1/22/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dixon v. Cooks | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Roger Dixon | |
| Represented By: | J. Carlton Taylor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mary Cooks | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
