Bennett v. Berryhill
Lorenzo Bennett |
Nancy Berryhill |
1:2019cv00142 |
March 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
P Bradley Murray |
William H Steele |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Social Security Brief - Plaintiff by Lorenzo Bennett. (Holland, Laura) Modified on 7/9/2019 (tgw). |
Filing 11 SOCIAL SECURITY TRANSCRIPT (Attorney Jillian Nelson,Jillian Erin Nelson for Nancy Berryhill added). Social Security Brief due by 7/8/2019. (Nelson, Jillian) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by Nancy Berryhill. (Nelson, Jillian) |
Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE of Summons & Complaint served 3/27/2019 as to Social Security Administration (tgw) |
Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE of Summons & Complaint served 3/27/2019 as to U.S. Attorney General (tgw) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed. U.S. Attorney's Office served on 3/22/2019, answer due 6/20/2019. (tgw) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Holly Lee Wiseman on behalf of Nancy Berryhill (Wiseman, Holly) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Note to Counsel: The Summons have been issued. (srd) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/27/2019: #1 Certified Mail Receipts) (tgw). |
Filing 4 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER entered; Answer due within 90 days after service; Plaintiff's Brief due 30 days thereafter. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 03/21/2019. (srd) |
Filing 3 ENDORSED ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Plaintiff Lorenzo Bennett on the grounds that his motion shows that (1) he is unable to pay the costs of commencing this action and (2) the action, being an appeal from the denial of social security benefits, is not frivolous or malicious. See Boubonis v. Chater, 957 F. Supp. 1071, 1072 (E.D. Wis. 1997) (citing 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) & (e)(2)(B)(i)). Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 3/20/19. (lto) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lorenzo Bennett. (Holland, Laura) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy Berryhill ( IFP.), filed by Lorenzo Bennett. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 summons, #3 summons, #4 summons) (Holland, Laura) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/20/2019: #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (tgw). |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - Referred to Judge P. Bradley Murray. (tgw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bennett v. Berryhill | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nancy Berryhill | |
Represented By: | Holly Lee Wiseman |
Represented By: | Jillian Nelson |
Represented By: | Jillian Erin Nelson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lorenzo Bennett | |
Represented By: | Ashley Brooke Thomas |
Represented By: | Laura Holland |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.