Buckley v. Berryhill
Airiel Joy Buckley |
Nancy Berryhill |
1:2019cv00263 |
June 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Terry F Moorer |
P Bradley Murray |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Return of Service, Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region IV, served 6/17/19 (per USPO website). (tot) |
Filing 10 Return of Service Executed as to Nancy Berryhill; U.S. Attny served on 6/13/2019, answer due 9/11/2019. (tot) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Holly Lee Wiseman on behalf of Nancy Berryhill (Wiseman, Holly) |
Filing 8 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER entered; Answer due within 90 days after service; Plaintiff's Brief due 30 days thereafter. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 6/12/2019. (copy to U.S. Attny w/summons on 6/12/2019) (skb) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Nancy Berryhill (SSA, U.S. Attny Gen, & U.S. Attny). (skb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/12/2019: #1 Certified Mail Receipts) (skb). |
Filing 6 ENDORSED ORDER granting #4 the amended Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Plaintiff Airiel Joy Buckley on the grounds that her motion shows that (1) she is unable to pay the costs of commencing this action and (2) the action, being an appeal from the denial of social security benefits, is not frivolous or malicious. See Boubonis v. Chater, 957 F. Supp. 1071, 1072 (E.D. Wis. 1997) (citing 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) & (e)(2)(B)(i)). Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 6/10/19. (lto) |
Filing 5 ENDORSED ORDER finding as moot #2 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees in light of the filing of #4 her amended motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 6/10/19. (lto) |
Filing 4 Amended MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Airiel Joy Buckley. (Holland, Laura) |
Filing 3 Order re: Plf's #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plf is to either pay the filing fee or to fully complete the Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees form on or before 6/20/2019 as set out. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 5/7/19. (tot) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Airiel J. Buckley. (Holland, Laura) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy Berryhill ( IFP.), filed by Airiel J. Buckley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 summons, #3 summons, #4 summons) (Holland, Laura) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis referred to Judge P. Bradley Murray. (tot) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Buckley v. Berryhill | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Airiel Joy Buckley | |
Represented By: | Laura Holland |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nancy Berryhill | |
Represented By: | Holly Lee Wiseman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.