Moore v. Tolliver et al
| Charles Eugene Moore |
| Kenneth Peters and Cleo Tolliver |
| 1:2019cv00599 |
| August 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Callie V S Granade |
| Katherine P Nelson |
| Prisoner: Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Order DENYING #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Charles Eugene Moore. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to re-file IFP or pay the filing fee on or before 11/8/2019 as set out. Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff IFP form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 10/09/2019. (srd) Copies to Plaintiff.
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Charles Eugene Moore. Referred to Judge Katherine P. Nelson (PSU). (srd) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Compel Kilby Correctional to forward Six Month Account Statement filed by Charles Eugene Moore; Referred to Judge Katherine P. Nelson(PSU) (mab) |
|
Filing 2
Order DIRECTING Plaintiff to pay filing fee or file a Motion to Proceed Without Payment on or before 10/3/2019. Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff IFP form as set out. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 09/03/2019. (srd) Copies to Plaintiff.
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (42:1983) against Kenneth Peters, Cleo Tolliver filed by Charles Eugene Moore. (Referred to MJ/Nelson(PSU) on 8/30/19) (tot) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
