Turner v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
Cassandra Turner |
Equifax Information Services, LLC and United Auto Credit Corporation |
1:2019cv00603 |
August 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Jeffrey U Beaverstock |
William E Cassady |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint filed by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Reid, Kirkland) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint to Judge Beaverstock (cmj) |
Filing 4 Service Order entered 9/6/2019. Plaintiff to notify the Court the action taken to effect service and the results thereof. Signed by District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock on 9/6/19. (cmj) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Equifax Information Services, LLC, United Auto Credit Corporation. Note to Counsel: The Summons have been issued. Please print copies necessary for service. (cmj) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons by Cassandra Turner (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Elliott, William) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number AALSDC-2467993, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Cassandra Turner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Elliott, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.