Marbury v. Steward et al
Mitchell Marbury |
William Streeter, J. Bullard and Cynthia Steward |
1:2019cv01103 |
December 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Jeffrey U Beaverstock |
Sonja F Bivins |
Prisoner: Prison Conditions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 LETTER from Mitchell Marbury addressed to Judge Beaverstock requesting he be allowed to leave Holman with his legal documents; ref to Judge Bivins(PSU) (cmj) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Mitchell Marbury. (Attachments: #1 letter)Referred to Judge Sonja F. Bivins/PSU. (cmj) |
Filing 4 Letter to Clerk requesting docket sheet as to Mitchell Marbury. (meh). Docket Sheet mailed to plaintiff. |
Filing 3 Order denying IFP motion and ordering plaintiff to pay the filing fee or file a copy of the institutional record of his inmate account no later than 2/17/20. ( Filing Fee due by 2/17/2020.). Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 1/16/20. (order mailed to plaintiff) (cmj) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Mitchell Marbury. Referred to Judge Sonja F. Bivins (PSU). (cmj) |
Filing 1 1983 COMPLAINT against J. Bullard, Cynthia Steward, William Streeter, filed by Mitchell Marbury; ref to Judge Bivins (PSU). (cmj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.