Beasley v. O'Reilly Auto Parts
Plaintiff: Teddy Beasley
Defendant: O Reilly Auto Parts and O'Reilly Auto Parts
Case Number: 1:2020cv00092
Filed: February 18, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Katherine P Nelson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 TEXT-ONLY ORDER on #17 Disclosure Statement filed by O'Reilly Auto Parts. A review does not reveal any reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require recusal in this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 3/27/2020. (ctn)
March 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendants O'Reilly Auto Parts, O'Reilly Automotive, Inc., O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent O'Reilly Automotive, Inc., Corporate Parent O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc. for O'Reilly Auto Parts.. (Wasden, H.)
March 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING ORDER entered Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/11/2020.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 3/26/20. (Attachments: #1 consent) (srr)
March 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 TEXT-ONLY ORDER: O'Reilly Auto Parts is ORDERED to file a disclosure statement in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 (required of "nongovernmental corporate" parties) and S.D. Ala. CivLR 7.1 (required of "[a]ll non-governmental artificial entities appearing as parties") no later than Wed. 4/1/2020 (form available at: https://www.alsd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms). Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 3/26/2020. (ctn)
March 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by O'Reilly Auto Parts. (Wasden, H.)
March 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ENDORSED ORDER granting #11 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; Answer due from O'Reilly Auto Parts 3/25/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 3/16/2020. (Nelson, Katherine)
March 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward I. Zwilling on behalf of Teddy Beasley (Zwilling, Edward)
March 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint filed by O'Reilly Auto Parts. (Wasden, H.)
March 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily C. Killion on behalf of O'Reilly Auto Parts (Killion, Emily)
March 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael David Strasavich on behalf of O'Reilly Auto Parts (Strasavich, Michael)
March 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by H. William Wasden on behalf of O'Reilly Auto Parts (Wasden, H.)
March 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Teddy Beasley. O'Reilly Auto Parts served on 2/21/2020, answer due 3/13/2020 (Rozynski, Andrew)
February 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ENDORSED ORDER granting #2 MOTION for Andrew Rozynski to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Plaintiff Teddy Beasley. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 2/20/2020. (ctn)
February 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Notice of Assignment to Magistrate Judge for trial. (Attachments: #1 request for reassignment) (srr)
February 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons Issued as to O'Reilly Auto Parts. Note to Counsel: The Summons have been issued. Please print copies necessary for service. (srr)
February 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE by Teddy Beasley re #1 Complaint Civil Cover Sheet and Proposed Summons (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons) (Rozynski, Andrew)
February 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION and APPLICATION for Andrew Rozynski to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney affirms that a certificate of good standing that complies with #S.D. Ala. GenLR 83.3(d) is attached. ( Filing fee $ 75, Receipt number AALSDC-2572663, Online Credit Card Payment) filed by Teddy Beasley. (Attachments: #1 Addendum - Admissions, #2 Addendum- Denials, #3 Certificate of Good Standing) (Rozynski, Andrew)
February 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against O Reilly Auto Parts ( Filing fee $400 receipt number AALSDC-2572649, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Teddy Beasley. (Rozynski, Andrew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beasley v. O'Reilly Auto Parts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: O Reilly Auto Parts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: O'Reilly Auto Parts
Represented By: H. William Wasden
Represented By: Michael David Strasavich
Represented By: Emily C. Killion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Teddy Beasley
Represented By: Andrew Rozynski
Represented By: Edward I. Zwilling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?