Lee v. Hillman et al
| Rebecca Marie Lee |
| Mikel Dempsey Hillman and 3 T's Trucking, LLC |
| 1:2020cv00103 |
| February 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Kristi K DuBose |
| Bert W Milling |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Clerk's Notice of Dismissal with prejudice (per doc. 5) pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). No order will be entered. See Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F. 3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2012) (nah) |
| REFERRAL OF #5 Stipulation of Dismissal to Judge DuBose. (nah) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Rebecca Marie Lee. (Citrin, Andrew) |
Filing 4
PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING ORDER entered. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/13/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bert W. Milling, Jr on 03/02/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (nah)
|
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by 3 T's Trucking, LLC. (Holman, William) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Mikel Dempsey Hillman. (Holman, William) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 400, Receipt number AALSDC-2575314, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Holman, William) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/26/2020: #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (nah). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
