Sawyer v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Company et al
Sheri Sawyer |
Cooper Tire & Rubber Company and Joseph Daniel Coggin |
1:2020cv00234 |
April 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Kristi K DuBose |
P Bradley Murray |
Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 Motion to Stay the Rule 26(f) meeting and report. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 06/05/2020. (nah) |
Filing 13 Joint MOTION to Stay Rule 26(F) Meeting and Report filed by Cooper Tire & Rubber Company. (Mattei, Blair) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #13 Joint MOTION to Stay Rule 26(F) Meeting and Report Referred to Judge P. Bradley Murray. (nah) |
Filing 12 Order Setting Motion Deadline re: #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Cooper Tire & Rubber Company and #11 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Sheri Sawyer. Responses due by 6/22/2020; Replies due by 7/2/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 05/26/2020. (nah) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #11 MOTION to Remand to State Court Referred to Judge P. Bradley Murray. (nah) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Sheri Sawyer. (Erdberg, Jaime) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction & #9 Evidentiary Material - Referred to Judge P. Bradley Murray. (tgw) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Cooper Tire & Rubber Company. (gifford, Kriston) |
Filing 9 Evidentiary Material to #10 Motion to Dismiss filed by Cooper Tire & Rubber Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of N.Schwieterman) (gifford, Kriston) Modified on 5/19/2020 (tgw). |
Filing 8 Document endorsed NOTED by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose: Corporate Disclosure Statement #6 filed by Cooper Tire & Rubber Company. Review of the corporate disclosure statement pursuant to S.D. Ala. Civ. L.R. 7.1 has been completed. The review did not reveal any reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest, which would require disqualification or recusal in this action. (khc) |
Filing 7 ORDER on #6 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Cooper Tire & Rubber Company. A review does not reveal any reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require recusal in this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 04/24/2020. (nah) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendant Cooper Tire & Rubber Company. (Johnson, Andrew) |
Filing 5 PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING ORDER entered. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/8/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 04/23/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Copy of Order mailed to Defendant Coggin and Attorneys Mark Erdberg and Wesley Ball) (nah) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Blair G. Mattei on behalf of Cooper Tire & Rubber Company (Mattei, Blair) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael E. Upchurch on behalf of Cooper Tire & Rubber Company (Upchurch, Michael) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by Cooper Tire & Rubber Company. (Johnson, Andrew) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 400, Receipt number AALSDC-2605313, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Cooper Tire & Rubber Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit State Court File, #3 Exhibit Notice of Filing Notice of Removal) (Johnson, Andrew) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/22/2020: #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (meh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.