Hare v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Beverly Ruth Hare |
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP |
1:2020cv00304 |
June 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Kristi K DuBose |
P Bradley Murray |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray: Scheduling Conference held on 7/21/2020. (eec) |
|
REFERRAL OF #13 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting to Judge Murray. (tgw) |
Filing 13 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting . (DeLashmet, W.) |
Filing 12 Notice of Filing Response to ROGs and RFP filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (DeLashmet, W.) |
Filing 11 Notice of Filing Response to ROGs and RFP filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (DeLashmet, W.) |
Filing 10 Notice of Filing Initial Disclosures filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (DeLashmet, W.) |
|
Filing 8 STRICKEN Notice of Filing Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents to Defendants filed by Beverly Ruth Hare. (Montgomery, Patrick) Modified on 6/11/2020 (nah). |
|
Filing 6 Document endorsed NOTED by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose: Corporate Disclosure Statement #2 filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. Review of the corporate disclosure statement pursuant to S.D. Ala. Civ. L.R. 7.1 has been completed. The review did not reveal any reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest, which would require disqualification or recusal in this action. (khc) |
Filing 5 This action has been transferred from the docket of Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray and is now assigned to the docket of Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose. To insure that your pleadings are referred to the proper Judge and Magistrate Judge with as little delay as possible, please use the letter suffix KD-MU after the case number on all future pleadings. (eec) |
|
Filing 3 Notice of Assignment to Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray for trial. (eec) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendants Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP identifying Corporate Parent Wal-Mart Stores East, LP for Wal-Mart Stores East, LP.. (DeLashmet, W.) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 400, Receipt number AALSDC-2625189, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A State Court File, #3 Exhibit B Pltf Rep to RFA, #4 Exhibit C BCBS Letter) (DeLashmet, W.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hare v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, LP | |
Represented By: | W. Pemble DeLashmet |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Beverly Ruth Hare | |
Represented By: | Patrick Glenn Montgomery |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.