Lohse v. Bryars et al
| Heather Lohse |
| Emily Bryars, Greg Oaks, Mobile County, Alabama and Kim Hastie |
| 1:2020cv00327 |
| June 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Jeffrey U Beaverstock |
| William E Cassady |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 REPLY to Response to Motion #2 to Stay filed by Emily Bryars, Kim Hastie, Mobile County, Alabama, Greg Oaks. (Townsend, Neal) |
| REFERRAL OF #5 Reply to Response to Motion to Judge Beaverstock. (cmj) |
| Filing 4 RESPONSE in Opposition re #2 MOTION to Stay filed by Heather Lohse. (Rainey, L.) |
| REFERRAL OF #4 Response in Opposition to Motion to Judge Beaverstock. (srd) |
Filing 3
Order re: #2 MOTION to Stay filed by Mobile County, Alabama. Plaintiff is ORDERED to respond to Motion by 8/11/2020. Defendant's reply due by 8/18/2020. Motion to be taken under submission on 8/19/2020. Signed by District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock on 07/28/2020. (srd)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Stay filed by Mobile County, Alabama. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (Townsend, Neal) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Stay. Referred to Judge Beaverstock. (srd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number AALSDC-2633725, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Heather Lohse. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 9/22/2020. (Rainey, L.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
