Dixon v. Colvin et al
| Jyron T. Dixon |
| Nathaniel James Colvin and Lexicon, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv00393 |
| August 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Jeffrey U Beaverstock |
| P Bradley Murray |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion #10 to Remand filed by Jyron T. Dixon. (Tobias, Desmond) |
| REFERRAL OF #14 Reply to Response to Motion to Judge Beaverstock. (cmj) |
| REFERRAL OF #13 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting to Judge Murray. (cmj) |
| Filing 13 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting . (Robinson, Ben) |
| REFERRAL OF #12 Response in Opposition to Motion to Judge Beaverstock. (cmj) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by Lexicon, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Robinson, Ben) |
Filing 11
Order Setting Motion Deadline re: #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Jyron T. Dixon. Responses due by 9/22/2020; Replies due by 9/29/2020; Motion to be taken under submission on 9/30/2020. Signed by District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock on 9/8/20. (cmj)
|
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court to Judge Beaverstock (cmj) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Jyron T. Dixon. (Tobias, Desmond) |
| Filing 9 Document endorsed NOTED by District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock: Corporate Disclosure Statement #5 filed by Lexicon, Inc. A review does not reveal any reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require recusal in this action. (jil) |
| Filing 8 Document endorsed NOTED by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray: A review of the Corporate Disclosure Statement #5 filed by Defendant Lexicon, Inc. reveals no reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require disqualification or recusal in this action. (lto) |
|
Filing 7
PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING ORDER entered Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/28/2020.. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 8/12/20. (cmj) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/12/2020: #1 Consent to Magistrate) (cmj).
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Lexicon, Inc.. (Robinson, Ben) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendant Lexicon, Inc.. (Robinson, Ben) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Nathaniel James Colvin re #1 Notice of Removal,, Notice of Consent to Removal (Morris, William) |
| Answer due from Lexicon, Inc. pursuant to FRCP 12(a). (cmj) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by William K. Morris on behalf of Nathaniel James Colvin (Morris, William) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Lexicon, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal,, (Attachments: #1 Supplement State Court Notice of Filing Notice of Removal) (Robinson, Ben) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 400, Receipt number AALSDC-2657459, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Lexicon, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Amended Complaint adding Lexicon, #3 Exhibit AL Crash Report MVA 2.28.20, #4 Exhibit Substitute, #5 Exhibit Letter f Aaron Oil re lost wages $15069.60, #6 Exhibit State Court DUI and CR case summaries combined, #7 Exhibit State court process, pleadings and orders, #8 Exhibit Part II - State court process, pleadings and orders) (Macoy, Cecil) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/10/2020: #9 Civil Cover Sheet) (cmj). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
