Minniefield v. Scotch Plywood Company, Inc. et al
| Laquesha Minniefield |
| Tracy Sigler and Scotch Plywood Company, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv00526 |
| November 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Kristi K DuBose |
| Bert W Milling |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING ORDER entered. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/15/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bert W. Milling, Jr on 12/01/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (srd)
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Scotch Plywood Company, Inc.. (Rebarchak, James) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Laquesha Minniefield. Scotch Plywood Company, Inc. served on 11/12/2020, answer due 12/3/2020 (Calamusa, Rocco) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Scotch Plywood Company, Inc., and Tracy Sigler. Note to Counsel: The Summons have been issued. Please print copies necessary for service. (srd) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons by Laquesha Minniefield (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Summonses) (Calamusa, Rocco) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number AALSDC-2704733, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Laquesha Minniefield. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 2/3/2021. (Calamusa, Rocco) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/5/2020: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (srd). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
