Tompkins v. N.C.W.C., Inc. et al
| Lindsey J. Tompkins |
| N.C.W.C., Inc. and Palmer Administrative Services, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv00569 |
| November 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| P Bradley Murray |
| William H Steele |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Order re: #10 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Lindsey J. Tompkins. This action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge William H. Steele on 12/23/20. (cmj)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Lindsey J. Tompkins (Underwood, Earl) |
| REFERRAL OF #10 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal to Judge Steele. (cmj) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to file an answer. Answer or 12(b) motion deadline reset to 1/31/21. Signed by District Judge William H. Steele on 12/15/20. (cmj)
|
| Answer due 1/13/2021 per doc. 9. (cmj) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead (Second Unopposed Motion) filed by N.C.W.C., Inc., Palmer Administrative Services, Inc.. (Montgomery, William) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead (Second Unopposed Motion) to Judge Steele (cmj) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants to file their answer(s) or Rule 12(b) motion(s) in response to the complaint by 12/16/20. Signed by District Judge William H. Steele on 12/3/20. (cmj)
|
| Answer due from N.C.W.C., Inc. on 12/16/2020; Palmer Administrative Services, Inc. on 12/16/2020. (cmj) |
| Filing 6 Document endorsed NOTED by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray: A review of the Corporate Disclosure Statements #2 filed by Defendant Palmer Administrative Services, Inc. and #4 by Defendant N.C.W.C., Inc., reveals no reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require disqualification or recusal in this action. (lto) |
| Filing 5 Documents endorsed NOTED by District Judge William H. Steele: Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 filed by N.C.W.C., Inc.; Corporate Disclosure Statement #2 filed by Palmer Administrative Services, Inc. (Steele, William) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendants N.C.W.C., Inc., Palmer Administrative Services, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Palmer Administrative Services, Inc. for N.C.W.C., Inc... (Montgomery, William) |
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead filed by N.C.W.C., Inc., Palmer Administrative Services, Inc.. (Montgomery, William) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendants Palmer Administrative Services, Inc., N.C.W.C., Inc. identifying Other Affiliate N.C.W.C., Inc. for Palmer Administrative Services, Inc... (Montgomery, William) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead to Judge Steele (cmj) |
| Answer due from N.C.W.C., Inc. and Palmer Administrative Services, Inc. within time set out in FRCP 12(a). (cmj) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 400, Receipt number AALSDC-2714888, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by N.C.W.C., Inc., Palmer Administrative Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons, #2 Exhibit B - Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal) (Montgomery, William) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/30/2020: #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (cmj). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
