Ceccanti et al v. Thomas
| Brian Ceccanti and Emily Ceccanti |
| Thurman R. Thomas |
| 1:2021cv00195 |
| April 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Terry F Moorer |
| P Bradley Murray |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion #9 filed by Brian Ceccanti, Emily Ceccanti. (Powell, Abner) |
| REFERRAL OF #13 Reply to #12 Response to #9 Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(1) or, in the alternative, Motion for Remand to Judge Moorer. (mab) |
| REFERRAL OF #12 Response to Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Remand to Judge Moorer. (tot) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE to #9 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Remand filed by Thurman R. Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Cost Sheet) (Barnett, Mary) |
Filing 11
Order re: #9 Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(1), or in the Alternative, Motion for Remand Pursuant to 28U.S.C. 1447(c). Responses due by 6/8/2021. Reply due by 6/16/2021. Motion to be taken under submission on 6/16/2021. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 5/17/2021. (mab)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Strike #8 Answer to Complaint filed by All Plaintiffs. (Powell, Abner) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(1) or, in the alterative, Motion for Remand Pursuant to 28:1447(c), filed by Brian Ceccanti, Emily Ceccanti. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (Powell, Abner). Added MOTION to Remand on 5/14/2021 (mab). |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #9 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the alternative, MOTION to Remand Referred to Judge Terry F. Moorer. (mab) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Thurman R. Thomas. (Barnett, Mary) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Alan Hughes, Jr on behalf of Brian Ceccanti, Emily Ceccanti (Hughes, Thomas) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Ian Campbell Meadows on behalf of Brian Ceccanti, Emily Ceccanti (Meadows, Ian) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Abner Riley Powell, IV on behalf of Brian Ceccanti, Emily Ceccanti (Powell, Abner) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER, GRANTING #3 Motion and Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Mary Judith Barnett. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 4/22/2021. (mab)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION and APPLICATION for Mary Judith Barnett to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed by Thurman R. Thomas. Attorney affirms that a certificate of good standing that complies with #S.D. Ala. GenLR 83.3(d) is attached. (Barnett, Mary) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #2 MOTION and APPLICATION for Mary Judith Barnett to Appear Pro Hac Vice; Referred to Judge Terry F. Moorer. (mab) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #3 Amended MOTION and APPLICATION for Mary Judith Barnett to Appear Pro Hac Vice; Referred to Judge Terry F. Moorer. (mab) |
| Filing 2 MOTION and APPLICATION for Mary Judith Barnett to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Mary Judith Barnett Attorney affirms that a certificate of good standing that complies with #S.D. Ala. GenLR 83.3(d) is attached. ( Filing fee $ 75, Receipt number AALSDC-2796558, Online Credit Card Payment) filed by Thurman R. Thomas. (Barnett, Mary) (Superseded by Doc. 3. Modified on 4/22/2021 (mab).) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 402, Receipt number AALSDC-2796347, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Thurman R. Thomas. (Barnett, Mary). (Additional attachment(s): #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit) (Main Document 1 replaced on 4/22/2021) (mab). |
| Answer due from Thurman R. Thomas pursuant to FRCP 81(c). (mab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
