Smoke v. Saul
Rochester Smoke, Jr. |
Andrew Saul |
1:2021cv00206 |
April 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
P Bradley Murray |
William H Steele |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 RETURN OF SERVICE of Summons & Complaint served 05/21/2021 as to Attorney General of the United States. (srd) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by U.S. Attorney. U.S. Attorney/SSA served on 5/10/2021, answer due 8/9/2021. (U.S. Attorney accepting service date as SSA's service date) See attachments. (srd) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Victoria Owen Todd on behalf of Andrew Saul (Todd, Victoria) |
Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE of certified mail re: SS Complaint served 5/10/21 as to SSA (cmj) |
Filing 6 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER entered; Answer due within 90 days after service; Plaintiff's Brief due 30 days thereafter. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 05/04/2021. (srd) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (srd) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/4/2021: #1 Cert Mail Receipts) (srd). |
Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as set out. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 05/03/2021. (srd) |
Filing 4 Order GRANTING #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Clerk is DIRECTED to serve summons and complaint on the Defendant as set out. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 05/03/2021. (srd) |
Filing 3 MOTION and APPLICATION for Karl E. Osterhout to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney affirms that a certificate of good standing that complies with #S.D. Ala. GenLR 83.3(d) is attached. ( Filing fee $ 75, Receipt number AALSDC-2800992, Online Credit Card Payment) filed by ROCHESTER SMOKE, JR. (Attachments: #1 Application, #2 Supplemental List of Court Admissions, #3 Certificate of Good Standing, #4 Proposed Order) (Osterhout, Karl) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by ROCHESTER SMOKE, JR. (Osterhout, Karl) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security ( IFP.), filed by ROCHESTER SMOKE, JR. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 7/29/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Osterhout, Karl) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and #3 MOTION and APPLICATION for Karl E. Osterhout to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney affirms that a certificate of good standing that complies with #S.D. Ala Referred to Judge P. Bradley Murray. (cmj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Smoke v. Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
Represented By: | Victoria Owen Todd |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rochester Smoke, Jr. | |
Represented By: | Karl E. Osterhout |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.