Allen v. Davis Hotshot Services, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Victoria M. Allen
Defendant: Davis Hotshot Services, LLC and Kenneth Dale Beasley
Case Number: 1:2021cv00263
Filed: June 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: William E Cassady
Referring Judge: William H Steele
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 5, 2021 Filing 9 Document endorsed NOTED by District Judge William H. Steele: Response to Order to Show Cause #7 filed by Kenneth Dale Beasley, Davis Hotshot Services, LLC. (Steele, William)
July 2, 2021 Filing 8 Document endorsed NOTED by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady: Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 filed by Davis Hotshot Services, LLC (Cassady, William)
July 2, 2021 Filing 7 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: #2 Order to Show Cause filed by Kenneth Dale Beasley, Davis Hotshot Services, LLC. (Hitson, Kenneth)
July 1, 2021 Filing 6 Document endorsed NOTED by District Judge William H. Steele: Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 filed by Davis Hotshot Services, LLC. (Steele, William)
July 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING ORDER entered Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 8/16/2021.. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 7/1/21. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Mag) (cmj)
July 1, 2021 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendant Davis Hotshot Services, LLC. (Hitson, Kenneth)
June 30, 2021 Filing 3 Davis Hotshot Service and Kenneth Beasley ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Kenneth Dale Beasley, Davis Hotshot Services, LLC. (Hitson, Kenneth)
June 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Defendant's Show Cause Response due by 7/6/2021 for failure to respond to complaint. Signed by District Judge William H. Steele on 6/29/2021. (cmj)
June 2, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Davis Hotshot Services, LLC, Kenneth Dale Beasley Notice of Removal (Filing Fee $402; Receipt No. 46031056217) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C) (Hitson, Kenneth) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/3/2021: #4 Filing Fee) (cmj). Modified on 6/3/2021 (cmj). (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/3/2021: #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (cmj). Modified on 6/4/2021 (cmj).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allen v. Davis Hotshot Services, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Davis Hotshot Services, LLC
Represented By: Kenneth A. Hitson, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenneth Dale Beasley
Represented By: Kenneth A. Hitson, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Victoria M. Allen
Represented By: Jack Smalley, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?