Mickles v. Bogota Columbia et al
| Terrell Mickles |
| Bogota Columbia and World Bank Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00346 |
| August 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Jeffrey U Beaverstock |
| Katherine P Nelson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of filing re: Commerce Electronic Funds Transfer Act by Terrell Mickles (cmj) |
Filing 4
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 9/14/21. (copy mailed to Mickles) (cmj)
|
| Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Terrell Mickles that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 USC 1915(g) because Plaintiff is barred from proceeding IFP and did not pay the filing fee. Objections to R&R due 14 days from the date of service of this document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 9/14/21. (copy mailed to Mickles) (cmj) |
| Filing 1 "Compact treaty protection electric fund act pursuant to 15 USCS Section 1693 and Gardian-Ward pursuant to 31 USCS Sect. 1102"; ref to Judge Nelson (cmj) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Terrell Mickles. Referred to Judge Katherine P. Nelson. (cmj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
