Montero v. Nguyen
Plaintiff: Jose I. Montero and Jose I. Tapia Montero
Defendant: Han Van Nguyen
Case Number: 1:2021cv00354
Filed: August 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Terry F Moorer
Referring Judge: Katherine P Nelson
Nature of Suit: Marine
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2021 Opinion or Order REFERRAL OF #8 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Remand to Judge Moorer. (tot)
October 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Memorandum in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Remand filed by Han Van Nguyen. (Quinlivan, Lawrence)
September 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER, DENYING without prejudice #2 Motion to Enroll Counsel of Record. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 9/15/2021. (mab)
September 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order re: #5 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. Defendant's response due by 10/7/2021. Plaintiff's reply due by 10/14/2021. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 9/15/2021. (mab)
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order MOTIONS REFERRED: #5 MOTION to Remand Referred to Judge Terry F. Moorer. (mab)
September 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION to Remand filed by Jose I. Tapia Montero. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (McGowin, Joseph)
August 17, 2021 Opinion or Order REFERRAL OF #4 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint to Judge Moorer. (tot)
August 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint filed by Jose I. Tapia Montero. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Amended Complaint) (McGowin, Joseph)
August 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Han Van Nguyen. (Quinlivan, Lawrence)
August 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Motion to Enroll Additional Counsel filed by Han Van Nguyen. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Quinlivan, Lawrence)
August 12, 2021 Opinion or Order REFERRAL OF #2 MOTION to Enroll Counsel of Record to Judge Moorer. (tot)
August 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 402, Receipt number AALSDC-2852927, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Han Van Nguyen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit) (Quinlivan, Lawrence)
August 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Answer to Complaint due from Han Van Nguyen pursuant to FRCP 81(c). (mab)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Montero v. Nguyen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose I. Montero
Represented By: Joseph Frederick McGowin, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose I. Tapia Montero
Represented By: Joseph Frederick McGowin, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Han Van Nguyen
Represented By: Lawrence Matthew Quinlivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?