James, Jr. v. Raybon et al
| Joe Nathan James, Jr. |
| Terry Raybon and Jefferson S. Dunn |
| 1:2021cv00450 |
| October 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Callie V S Granade |
| P Bradley Murray |
| Prisoner: Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Order for Payment of Remainder of Prisoner Filing Fee. ADOC to collect payments pursuant to 28:1915(b)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 11/10/2021. (Copies mailed to Plf, Commissioner of ADOC, and Business Manager at Holeman Correctional Facility on 11/10/2021) (cjr)
|
| Filing 4 Partial Filing Fee: $2.50, receipt number 46031057261. Referred to MJ Murray (PSU). (cjr) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING Plf's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plf is to remit a money order in the amount of $2.50 to the Clerk within 21 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 10/14/21. (copy mailed to Plf on 10/15/21) (tot)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Joe Nathan James, Jr. (Referred to Judge P. Bradley Murray(PSU) on 10/14/21) (tot) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (42:1983) against Jefferson S. Dunn, Terry Raybon filed by Joe Nathan James, Jr. (Referred to MJ/Murray(PSU) on 10/14/21) (tot) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
