Mickles v. United States of America et al
| Terrell Mickles |
| United States of America, Bush Administration, Obama Administration, Atlantic Records, Epic Records, Universal Records, Def Jam Records, Sony Records, Interscope Records and Priority Records |
| 1:2021cv00463 |
| October 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Jeffrey U Beaverstock |
| Katherine P Nelson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT - it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiffs action is DISMISSED without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Signed by Chief District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock on 11/30/2021. (meh) |
Filing 3
ORDER ADOPTING #2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Terrell Mickles. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Chief District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock on 11/30/2021. (meh)
|
| Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Terrell Mickles. Objections to R&R due 14 days from the date of service of this document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 11/2/21. (copy mailed to plaintiff) (cmj) |
| Filing 1 1983 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Terrell Mickles. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 1/20/2022; ref to Judge Nelson. (cmj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
