Coley v. SoClean, Inc.
Richard M Coley and Richard M. Coley |
SoClean, Inc. |
1:2021cv00472 |
October 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Sonja F Bivins |
Terry F Moorer |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING Dft's #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. The time for SoClean to respond to Plf's Class Action Complaint is EXTENDED to 21 days after the JPML rules on a pending request to consolidate this action with others in an MDL proceeding. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 11/19/21. (tot) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to SoClean, Inc. by Richard M. Coley. SoClean, Inc. served on 11/5/2021, answer due 11/26/2021 (Hamil, Jubal) |
Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, filed by SoClean, Inc.. (Tompkins, Jason) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to SoClean, Inc. (NOTE TO COUNSEL: The Summons has been issued. Please print copies necessary for service.) (tot) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SoClean, Inc. ( Filing fee $402 receipt number AALSDC-2899102, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Richard M Coley. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 1/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Summons) (Hamil, Jubal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.