Metz v. Officer D. Bridges et al
Plaintiff: George Douglas Metz and George D. Metz, II
Defendant: Officer D. Bridges and Officer J. Dodson
Case Number: 1:2021cv00540
Filed: December 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Terry F Moorer
Referring Judge: P Bradley Murray
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ***Case Transfer Confirmation. Case received and opened in Alabama Middle District, Case Number 1:22-cv-00056. (cjr)
January 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING #3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; This action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Southern Division. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to effectuate the transfer. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 01/27/2022. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff on 01/28/2022) (cjr)
January 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Officer D. Bridges and Officer J. Dodson on 12/21/2021 by George D. Metz, II. (cjr)
December 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that case be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. Objections to R&R due 14 days from the date of service of this document. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 12/16/2021. (copy to Pltf) (mab)
December 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Order, this action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for consideration & disposition or recommendation on all pretrial matters as may be appropriate. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 12/15/21. (copy mailed to Plf on 12/15/21) (tot)
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Officer D. Bridges, Officer J. Dodson filed by George D. Metz, II. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 3/10/2022. (Filing Fee: $402.00; Receipt No. 46031057511) (FLASH DRIVE RECEIVED & PLACED IN FILE) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt for Filing Fee) (Referred to MJ/Murray(PSU) on 12/15/21) (tot) Modified on 12/15/2021 (tot).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Metz v. Officer D. Bridges et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George Douglas Metz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George D. Metz, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer D. Bridges
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer J. Dodson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?