McKeithen v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
| Penny McKeithen |
| Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Walmart Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00215 |
| June 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Kristi K DuBose |
| P Bradley Murray |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 NOTICE by Penny McKeithen Notice of Service of Discovery (Canida, Nicolas) |
Filing 17
SCHEDULING ORDER: Pretrial Conference set for 9/7/2023 at 10:00 AM before District Judge Kristi K. DuBose. Jury Selection set for 10/3/2023 at 08:45AM. Trial to take place during the October 2023 trial terms, dates to be set at the final pretrial conference. ETT 3 days. Discovery cutoff 5/12/2023. Amended Pleadings due by 10/30/2022. Motions due by 6/10/2023. Position Regarding Settlement due by 5/12/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 7/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Standing Pretrial Order) (meh) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray: Scheduling Conference held on 7/12/2022. (Digital Court Recording; Courtroom 5A) (eec) |
| Filing 15 Notice of Filing Notice of Intent to Serve Subpoenas on Non-Parties filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Walmart Inc.. (Marchand, Chad) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicolas Trey Canida on behalf of Penny McKeithen (Canida, Nicolas) |
| Set Hearing: Scheduling Conference set for 7/12/2022 at 02:30 PM in US Courthouse, Courtroom 5A, 155 St. Joseph Street, Mobile, AL 36602 before Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray. (meh) |
|
Filing 13
TEXT ONLY ORDER: This cause is before the Court on the parties' Rule 26(f) Report, filed June 22, 2022. (Doc. 10). This action shall come on for a Rule 16(b) scheduling conference on July 12, 2022, at 2:30 p.m., in Courtroom 5A, United States Courthouse, Mobile, Alabama, as it is the undersigned's belief that bringing the parties and the Court together at this stage promotes efficiency in the litigation process, helps avoid discovery disputes, provides a clearer path to pretrial resolution, and allows counsel to pose questions to the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(1)(B) (providing that a magistrate judge must issue a scheduling order "after consulting with the parties' attorneys... at a scheduling conference."). Out of town counsel may attend the scheduling conference by telephone in lieu of attendance in person by filing a notice with the Court and using the following numbers to call-in for the conference call: CALL IN NO.: 571-353-2301 and Guest ID: 002111803. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 6/22/22. (lto)
|
| Filing 12 Notice of Filing First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Plaintiff filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Walmart Inc.. (Marchand, Chad) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Filing Walmart's Initial Disclosures filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Walmart Inc.. (Marchand, Chad) |
| Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting . (Marchand, Chad) |
| Filing 9 Document endorsed NOTED by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray: A review of the Corporate Disclosure Statement #7 filed by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, reveals no reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require disqualification or recusal in this action. (lto) |
| Filing 8 Document endorsed NOTED by District Judge Kristi K. DuBose: Disclosure Statement #7 . A review of the disclosure statement has been completed. That review has not revealed any reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require disqualification or recusal in this action. (gcp) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendants Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Walmart Inc.. (Franklin, Keith) |
|
Filing 6
Order re: #1 Notice of Removal and #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Walmart Inc. It is ORDERED that the Disclosure Statement is STRICKEN and Defendant Wal-Mart Stores East, LP shall file, on or before 6/16/2022, a new Disclosure Statement, as set out. Signed by District Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 6/9/2022. (meh)
|
|
Filing 5
PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING ORDER entered. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 7/18/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 6/6/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (meh)
|
| Filing 4 Document endorsed NOTED by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray: A review of the Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 filed by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, reveals no reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require disqualification or recusal in this action. (lto) |
| Filing 3 STRICKEN per #6 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendants Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Walmart Inc.. (Marchand, Chad) Modified on 6/9/2022 (meh). |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Walmart Inc.. (Marchand, Chad) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 402, Receipt number AALSDC-3020237, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Walmart Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A Court File, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B Letter Correspondence, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C Email Correspondence) (Marchand, Chad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
