Townson v. Garland et al
| Preston B. Townson |
| Merrick Garland, Department of Justice and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives |
| United States Attorney for the Southern District of Alabama |
| 1:2022cv00251 |
| June 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Kristi K DuBose |
| Katherine P Nelson |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Preston B. Townson. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives served on 7/5/2022, answer due 9/6/2022. (Harris, John)
|
|
Filing 10
SUMMONS Returned Executed United States Attorney's Office, SD Alabama by Preston B. Townson. Merrick Garland served on 7/1/2022, answer due 9/6/2022 (Harris, John)
|
|
Filing 9
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Preston B. Townson. Department of Justice served on 7/5/2022, answer due 9/6/2022. (Harris, John)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Preston B. Townson. Merrick Garland served on 7/5/2022, answer due 9/6/2022. (Harris, John)
|
|
Filing 7
Summons Issued as to Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Department of Justice, Merrick Garland. Note to Counsel: The Summons have been issued. Please print copies necessary for service. (meh)
|
|
Filing 6
ENDORSED ORDER granting #4 MOTION and APPLICATION for John I. Harris III to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Preston B. Townson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 6/28/2022. (ctn)
|
|
REFERRAL OF #4 MOTION and APPLICATION for John I. Harris III to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney affirms that a certificate of good standing that complies with #S.D. Al, #5 Notice of filing Proposed Order, to Judge Nelson. (meh)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Filing Proposed Order by Preston B. Townson re: #4 MOTION and APPLICATION for John I. Harris III to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney affirms that a certificate of good standing that complies with #S.D. Al (Harris, John)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION and APPLICATION for John I. Harris III to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney affirms that a certificate of good standing that complies with #S.D. Ala. GenLR 83.3(d) is attached. ( Filing fee $ 75, Receipt number AALSDC-3031253, Online Credit Card Payment) filed by Preston B. Townson. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing) (Harris, John)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons by Preston B. Townson as to all parties (Harris, John)
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Plaintiff Preston B. Townson. (Harris, John)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Department of Justice, Merrick Garland ( Filing fee $402 receipt number AALSDC-3031204, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Preston B. Townson. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 9/26/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Ex 1 - Townson application for license, #3 Exhibit Ex 2 - Industry Operations Manual, #4 Exhibit Ex 3 - ATF blank appliction form, #5 Exhibit Ex 4 - ATF 5300.4 "White Book", #6 Exhibit Ex 5 - John Gleaton license application, #7 Exhibit Ex 6 - ATF Notice of Denial, #8 Exhibit Ex 7 - Townson request for hearing, #9 Exhibit Ex 8 - Townson offer of settlement, #10 Exhibit Ex 9 - Townson requests regarding hearing, #11 Exhibit Ex 10 - Government's reply to hearing request, #12 Exhibit Ex 11- ATF Final Notice of Denial) (Harris, John)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
