Williams v. Westlake Services, LLC, et al
| Monica Williams |
| Westlake Services, LLC doing business as Westlake Financial Services and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00283 |
| July 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Terry F Moorer |
| P Bradley Murray |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Document endorsed NOTED by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray: A review of the Corporate Disclosure Statement #5 filed by Defendant Westlake Services, LLC reveals no reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require disqualification or recusal in this action. (lto) |
| Filing 10 Document endorsed NOTED by District Judge Terry F. Moorer: Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Westlake Services, LLC (Doc. #5 ): A review does not reveal any reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require recusal in this action. (mab) |
Filing 9
TEXT-ONLY ORDER: Defendant Westlake Services, LLC's Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead (Doc. #8 ) is GRANTED. The deadline for Defendant to file said pleading is EXTENDED to September 28, 2022. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 9/12/2022. (mab)
|
| Filing 8 Second Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead filed by Westlake Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Harrell, Roy) Modified on 9/12/2022 (mab). |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #8 Second Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead; Referred to Judge Terry F. Moorer. (mab) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Monica Williams. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. served on 8/3/2022, answer due 8/24/2022 (Lockhart, Patricia) |
|
Filing 6
TEXT-ONLY ORDER: Defendant Westlake Services, LLC's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead (Doc. #4 ) is GRANTED. The deadline for Defendant to file said pleading is EXTENDED to September 14, 2022. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 8/23/2022. (mab)
|
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendants Westlake Services, LLC, Nowlake Technology, LLC, Westlake Services Holding Company, MAI Holding, LLC identifying Other Affiliate Nowlake Technology, LLC, Other Affiliate Westlake Services Holding Company, Other Affiliate MAI Holding, LLC for Westlake Services, LLC.. (Harrell, Roy) |
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Westlake Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Harrell, Roy) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Monica Williams. Westlake Services, LLC served on 8/3/2022, answer due 8/24/2022 (Lockhart, Patricia) |
| Filing 2 Summonses Issued as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc., & Westlake Services, LLC. (Note to Counsel: The Summonses have been issued. Please print copies necessary for service.) (mab) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Westlake Services, LLC d/b/a Westlake Financial Services ( Filing fee $402 receipt number AALSDC-3042400, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Monica Williams. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 10/17/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons) (Lockhart, Patricia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
