Kidd v. The City of Monroeville et al
Plaintiff: Roy Riley Kidd, III
Defendant: The City of Monroeville and Michael Gibson
Case Number: 1:2022cv00388
Filed: September 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Callie V S Granade
Referring Judge: Katherine P Nelson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING for 11/28/2022 at 10:30 a.m. (Central) before Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 11/16/2022. (fz)
November 14, 2022 Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting . (Morgan, Randall)
November 14, 2022 REFERRAL OF #8 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting to Judge Nelson. (tot) Modified on 11/14/2022 (tot).
October 17, 2022 Filing 7 Case Reassigned to Senior Judge Callie V. S. Granade. Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson no longer assigned to the case. To insure that your pleadings are referred to the proper Judge and Magistrate Judge with as little delay as possible, please use the letter suffix CG-N after the case number on all future pleadings. (tgw)
October 4, 2022 Filing 6 This civil action has been REASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson. Notice of Assignment to Magistrate Judge Nelson for trial. (Attachments: #1 Request for Reassignment Form) (tgw)
September 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING ORDER entered. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/14/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 9/30/2022. (eec)
September 30, 2022 Filing 4 Notice of Assignment to Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady for trial. (eec)
September 29, 2022 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Michael Gibson, The City of Monroeville. (Morgan, Randall)
September 29, 2022 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendants Michael Gibson, The City of Monroeville. (Morgan, Randall)
September 29, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 402, Receipt number AALSDC-3078201, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A) (Morgan, Randall)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kidd v. The City of Monroeville et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roy Riley Kidd, III
Represented By: Amardo Wesley Pitters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The City of Monroeville
Represented By: Brad Anthony Everhardt
Represented By: Randall Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Gibson
Represented By: Brad Anthony Everhardt
Represented By: Randall Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?