Cui v. United States of America et al
| Peter Markus and Ling Cui |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Merrick Garland, SEAN COSTELLO, XUILU RUAN, United States Department of Justice and Sean P. Costello |
| 1:2022cv00456 |
| November 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Sonja F Bivins |
| Callie V S Granade |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE by Ling Cui of Service Attempt (Ho, Kenneth) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ling Cui. Sean P. Costello served on 12/27/2022 (Ho, Kenneth) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ling Cui. Merrick Garland served on 12/27/2022 (Ho, Kenneth) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ling Cui. United States Department of Justice served on 12/27/2022 (Ho, Kenneth) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ling Cui. United States of America served on 12/27/2022 (Ho, Kenneth) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Sean P. Costello, Merrick Garland, Xuilu Ruan, United States Department of Justice (Attny Gen of the United States, U.S. Dept. of Justice/Assistant Attorney Gen for Administration, & U.S. Attny) United States of America (Attny Gen of the United States, U.S. Dept. of Justice/Assistant Attorney Gen for Administration, & U.S. Attny). (NOTE TO COUNSEL: The Summons have been issued. Please print copies necessary for service. (tot) |
Filing 7
ENDORSED ORDER granting Doc. 2 Motion for Kenneth K. Ho to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 11/18/2022. (abm)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons by Ling Cui (Ho, Kenneth) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Certificate of Good Standing re: #2 MOTION and APPLICATION for Kenneth K. Ho to Appear Pro Hac Vice. filed by Ling Cui. (Ho, Kenneth) Modified on 11/17/2022 (tot). |
| Filing 4 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Ling Cui. Amendment to #1 Complaint, Amended Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons, Merrick Garland, #2 Summons, Sean Costello, #3 Summons, Xuilu Ruan, #4 Summons, U.S. Dept. of Justice) (Ho, Kenneth) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #2 MOTION and APPLICATION for Kenneth K. Ho to Appear Pro Hac Vice & #5 Notice of Filing Certificate of Good Standing referred to Judge Sonja F. Bivins. (tot) |
| Filing 3 Service Notice entered 11/15/2022. Plaintiff to notify the Court the action taken to effect service and the results thereof. Service order deadline set to 12/29/2022. (tot) |
| Filing 2 MOTION and APPLICATION for Kenneth K. Ho to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Kenneth K. Ho, Attorney affirms that a certificate of good standing that complies with #S.D. Ala. GenLR 83.3(d) is attached. ( Filing fee $ 75, Receipt number AALSDC-3102537, Online Credit Card Payment) filed by Ling Cui. (Attachments: #1 Form-Motion for admission pro hac vice, #2 Exhibit Certificates of Good Standing) (Ho, Kenneth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Receipt number AALSDC-3102318, Fee Paid at Intake), filed by Ling Cui. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 2/12/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1- Property in which Cui Claims an Interest, #2 Exhibit Ex. 2- Property Division Order, #3 Exhibit Ex. 3- Judgment of Divorce, #4 Exhibit Ex. 4- Forfeiture Order, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons) (Ho, Kenneth) (Attachment 5 replaced on 11/14/2022) (cjr). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
