Crutcher v. Canopius US Insurance, Inc.
Christie B. Crutcher |
Canopius US Insurance, Inc. |
1:2022cv00472 |
November 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Jeffrey U Beaverstock |
Sonja F Bivins |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING ORDER entered Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/3/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 01/17/2023. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Mag) (cjr) (Main Document 11 replaced on 1/18/2023) (cjr). |
REFERRAL OF #10 Reply to Response to Motion to Judge Beaverstock. (cmj) |
Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion #3 filed by Canopius US Insurance, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Letter dated April 6, 2022) (Williams, Priscilla) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion re: #3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim for Bad Faith Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Christie B. Crutcher. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Estimate, #2 Exhibit B-Pymt Letter, #3 Exhibit C-Partial Declination of Coverage, #4 Text of Proposed Order) (Butler, Andrea) |
REFERRAL OF #9 Response to Motion, to Judge Beaverstock. (cmj) |
Filing 8 ENDORSED ORDER granting Doc. 7 Motion for Andrea Butler to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 11/30/2022. (abm) |
Filing 7 MOTION and APPLICATION for Andrea Butler to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney affirms that a certificate of good standing that complies with #S.D. Ala. GenLR 83.3(d) is attached. ( Filing fee $ 75, Receipt number AALSDC-3109619, Online Credit Card Payment) filed by Christie B. Crutcher. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing) (Butler, Andrea) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #7 MOTION and APPLICATION for Andrea Butler to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney affirms that a certificate of good standing that complies with #S.D. Ala. Ge Referred to Judge Sonja F. Bivins. (cmj) |
Filing 6 Order Setting Motion Deadline re: #3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim for Bad Faith Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Canopius US Insurance, Inc. Responses due by 12/6/2022; Replies due by 12/13/2022; Motion to be taken under submission on 12/14/2022. Signed by Chief District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock on 11/22/22. (cmj) |
Filing 5 Document endorsed NOTED by Chief District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock: Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 filed by Canopius US Insurance, Inc. A review does not reveal any reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require recusal in this action. (jil) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim for Bad Faith Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) to Judge Beaverstock (cmj) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendant Canopius US Insurance, Inc.. (Williams, Priscilla) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim for Bad Faith Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Canopius US Insurance, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Policy) (Williams, Priscilla) |
Filing 2 PARTIAL ANSWER to Complaint by Canopius US Insurance, Inc.. (Williams, Priscilla) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 402, Receipt number AALSDC-3106379, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Canopius US Insurance, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Circuit Court of Mobile County record, #3 Exhibit C - Demand Letter) (Williams, Priscilla) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/22/2022: #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (fz). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.