Jones v. The Whirlpool Corporation
| Jarvis Jones |
| The Whirlpool Corporation |
| 1:2022cv00475 |
| November 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Kristi K DuBose |
| Katherine P Nelson |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Order re: #10 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting filed by The Whirlpool Corporation. Scheduling Conference set for 1/26/2023 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson BY TELEPHONE. See order for call-in information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 1/20/2023. (meh)
|
|
REFERRAL OF #10 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting to Judge Nelson. (meh)
|
|
Filing 10
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting . (Peddy, A.)
|
|
Filing 9
Document endorsed NOTED by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson: Corporate Disclosure Statement #7 filed by The Whirlpool Corporation. A review does not reveal any reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require recusal in this action.(pdo)
|
|
Filing 8
Document endorsed NOTED by District Judge Kristi K. DuBose: Disclosure Statement #7 . A review of the disclosure statement has been completed. That review has not revealed any reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require disqualification or recusal in this action. (gcp)
|
|
Filing 7
Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendant The Whirlpool Corporation. (Dettling, Ethan)
|
|
Filing 6
PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING ORDER entered. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/19/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 12/5/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (meh)
|
|
Filing 5
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Whirlpool Corporation. (Peddy, A.)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Lacey Daughdrill Smith on behalf of Jarvis Jones (Smith, Lacey)
|
|
Filing 3
TEXT-ONLY ORDER: The corporate disclosure statement #2 filed by Defendant is insufficient under this Court's local rules. Though it cites and tracks the language of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, the local disclosure requirements are broader than the federal rules require. See S.D. Ala. CivLR 7.1(b) ("The Disclosure statement shall identify the represented entity's general nature and shall identify all parents, subsidiaries, partners, members, managers, trustees, affiliates, and similarly related persons and entities[,]" without regard to whether they have issued shares to the public.). See also, Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 advisory committee's note to 2002 adoption ("Rule 7.1 does not prohibit local rules that require disclosures in addition to those required by Rule 7.1."). Accordingly, Defendant Whirlpool Corporation is ORDERED to file an amended disclosure statement that certifies disclosure required by S.D. Ala. CivLR 7.1 no later than December 6, 2022. Though not required to be on this Court's specific disclosure form, use of this format may be beneficial, and it can be found on the Court's website at: https://www.alsd.uscourts.gov/forms/allforms. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 11/29/2022. (pdo)
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendants The Whirlpool Corporation, Vanguard Group, PRIMECAP, Whirlpool S.A., Whirlpool of India Limited, Whirlpool China Co., Ltd identifying Corporate Parent Vanguard Group, Corporate Parent PRIMECAP, Other Affiliate Whirlpool S.A., Other Affiliate Whirlpool of India Limited, Other Affiliate Whirlpool China Co., Ltd for The Whirlpool Corporation.. (Dettling, Ethan)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 402, Receipt number AALSDC-3107337, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by The Whirlpool Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Supplement Corporate Disclosure) (Dettling, Ethan)
|
|
Answer due from The Whirlpool Corporation pursuant to FRCP 81(c). (meh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. The Whirlpool Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jarvis Jones | |
| Represented By: | Desmond V. Tobias |
| Represented By: | Lacey Daughdrill Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Whirlpool Corporation | |
| Represented By: | A. Joe Peddy |
| Represented By: | Ethan Richard Dettling |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
