Ruffin v. Mobile County Metro Jail et al
| Darrell Ruffin |
| Mobile County Metro Jail and Mobile County Court House |
| 1:2022cv00477 |
| November 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Sonja F Bivins |
| Terry F Moorer |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER, Ruffine must choose the type of action he wishes to pursue in this case. Rufflin's motion to proceed without prepayment of fees #2 is DENIED without prejudice as set out. If desired to proceed with this action, Plt is ORDERED to file, on or before 12/30/2022, a 2241 habeas petition or a 1983 civil rights complaint. Plt is ORDERED to pay the required filing fee or file a new IFP motion NLT 12/30/2022. Clerk is DIRECTED to send Ruffine, habeas petition, 1983, and IFP motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 11/30/2022. Forms and copy of this order mailed to Ruffin. (fz)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Darrell Ruffin. (Referred to Judge Sonja F. Bivins(PSU) on 11/29/22). (tot)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT (42:1983) against Mobile County Court House, Mobile County Metro Jail filed by Darrell Ruffin. (Referred to MJ/Bivins(PSU) on 11/29/22) (tot)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
