Darrington v. Navy Federal Credit Union
| Tiana Darrington |
| Navy Federal Credit Union |
| 1:2023cv00016 |
| January 12, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| William E Cassady |
| Kristi K DuBose |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER DISMISSING as MOOT #4 Motion to Dismiss as set out. Signed by District Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 3/2/2023. (meh)
|
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Navy Federal Credit Union filed by Tiana Darrington. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7) (meh) |
| REFERRAL OF #10 Amended Complaint to Judge DuBose. (meh) |
|
Filing 9
Order re: #8 MOTION to Amend Complaint #1 Complaint, filed by Tiana Darrington. The motion to amend is dismissed as MOOT. Darrington must file her amended complaint within 24 days of 2/7/2023, as set out. Copy to Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 2/16/2023. (meh)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Amend Complaint #1 , filed by Tiana Darrington. Referred to Judge DuBose. (meh) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tiana Darrington. Navy Federal Credit Union served on 1/17/2023, answer due 2/7/2023 (meh) |
|
Filing 6
ENDORSED ORDER taking under advisement #4 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff shall file a response to the motion not later than March 1, 2023. Defendant may reply to Plaintiff's response if that reply is filed not later than March 15, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 2/8/23. (Cassady, William)
|
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #4 MOTION to Dismiss Referred to Judge William E. Cassady. (meh) |
| Filing 5 Memorandum in Support re #4 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Navy Federal Credit Union. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Harrell, Roy) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Navy Federal Credit Union. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Harrell, Roy) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Navy Federal Credit Union at Intake (meh) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 1061737 (meh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Navy Federal Credit Union, filed by Tiana Darrington. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 4/12/2023. Referred to Judge Cassady. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7) (meh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/13/2023: #8 Civil Cover Sheet) (meh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Darrington v. Navy Federal Credit Union | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tiana Darrington | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Navy Federal Credit Union | |
| Represented By: | Roy Wallace Harrell, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
