Thomas v. Wells Fargo Bank
Michael Thomas |
Wells Fargo Bank |
1:2023cv00206 |
June 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Sonja F Bivins |
Terry F Moorer |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Order re: #11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Wells Fargo Bank. Response to Motion due on or before 8/18/2023. Any reply by Defendant shall be filed by 8/25/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 7/28/2023. (srd) Copy mailed to Plaintiff (srd). |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Wells Fargo Bank. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Memorandum in Support) (Freese, Jackson) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint referred to Judge Sonja F. Bivins. (tot) |
Filing 10 ORDER DENYING #6 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction as moot. This case is REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 7/19/2023. Copy to Plt. (fz) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion re: #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Michael Thomas. Referred to Judge Bivins. (fz) |
Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Wells Fargo Bank, filed by Michael Thomas. Referred to MJ Bivins. (cjr) |
Filing 7 Order re: Dft's #6 MOTION to Dismiss. Plf is to file a response to the motion on or before 8/1/2023. Any reply by Dft should be filed by 8/8/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 7/11/23. (copy mailed to Plf on 7/11/23) (tot) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Referred to Judge Sonja F. Bivins. (mab) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Wells Fargo Bank. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss) (Hayslip, Victor) |
Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING case to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), for consideration and disposition or recommendation on all pretrial matters as may be appropriate. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 6/6/2023. Copy to Plaintiff. (fz) |
Filing 2 Filing fee: $402.00, receipt number 1062571. (fz) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Mailing by Certified Mail by Michael Thomas. (Referred to MJ/Bivins(PSU) on 6/14/23) (tot) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Wells Fargo Bank at intake and given to Plaintiff for service. (fz) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wells Fargo Bank, filed by Michael Thomas. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 9/5/2023. (fz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Thomas v. Wells Fargo Bank | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael Thomas | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank | |
Represented By: | Victor Lee Hayslip |
Represented By: | Jackson Alexander Freese |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.