Thomas v. Family Security Credit Union
| Michael Thomas |
| Family Security Credit Union |
| 1:2023cv00222 |
| June 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Jeffrey U Beaverstock |
| Sonja F Bivins |
| Terry F Moorer |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
RESPONSE to Motion to Dismiss/Reason for Claim re: #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Michael Thomas. Referred to Judge Bivins. (fz)
|
|
Filing 7
Order re: Dft's #6 MOTION to Dismiss. Plf is to file a response on or before 7/28/2023. Any reply by Dft should be filed 8/4/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 7/7/23. (copy mailed to Plf on 7/7/23) (tot) Modified on 7/7/2023 (tot).
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , Failure to State a Claim, or, in the Alternative, Motion for a More Definite Statement filed by Family Security Credit Union. (Kudulis, Jonathan). Added MOTION for More Definite Statement on 7/6/2023 (mab).
|
|
MOTIONS REFERRED: #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , Failure to State a Claim, or, in the Alternative, Motion for a More Definite Statement ; Referred to Judge Sonja F. Bivins. (mab)
|
|
Filing 5
Order, this action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for consideration & disposition or recommendation on all pretrial matters as may be appropriate. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 7/5/23. (copy mailed to Plf on 7/5/23) (tot)
|
|
Case reassigned to District Judge Terry F. Moorer. Chief District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock no longer assigned to the case. To insure that your pleadings are referred to the proper Judge and Magistrate Judge with as little delay as possible, please use the letter suffix TFM-B after the case number on all future pleadings. (cle)
|
|
Filing 4
Service Order entered 6/13/2023. Plaintiff to notify the Court the action taken to effect service and the results thereof. Service order deadline set to 7/28/2023. Signed by Chief District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock on 6/13/2023. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (fz)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Family Security Credit Union. Summons issued at intake and given to Plaintiff for service. (fz)
|
|
Filing 2
Filing fee: $402.00, receipt number 1062629. (fz)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Family Security Credit Union, filed by Michael Thomas. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 9/11/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (fz)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thomas v. Family Security Credit Union | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Thomas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Family Security Credit Union | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Kudulis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
