Roberts et al v. Prime Insurance Company
Clarence L. Roberts and Arkyla Miller |
Prime Insurance Company |
1:2023cv00241 |
June 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Kristi K DuBose |
Terry F Moorer |
P Bradley Murray |
Katherine P Nelson |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 17 MOTION to Amend Complaint filed by Arkyla Miller, Clarence L. Roberts. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint) (Kittrell, William) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #17 MOTION to Amend Complaint . Referred to Judge DuBose. (meh) |
|
|
Filing 14 Document endorsed NOTED by District Judge Kristi K. DuBose: Disclosure Statement #4 . A review of the disclosure statement has been completed. That review has not revealed any reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require disqualification or recusal in this action. (gcp) |
Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion #5 to Dismiss filed by Prime Insurance Company. (Oliver, Blake) |
REFERRAL OF #13 Reply to Response to Motion to Judge DuBose. (jmr) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Arkyla Miller, Clarence L. Roberts. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1) (Aaron, Brett) |
REFERRAL OF #12 Response in Opposition to Motion to Judge DuBose. (meh) |
Filing 11 Document endorsed NOTED by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray: A review of the Disclosure Statement #4 filed by Defendant Prime Insurance Company reveals no reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require disqualification or recusal in this action. (lto) |
|
Case Reassigned to District Judge Kristi K. DuBose and Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray. District Judge Terry F. Moorer, Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson no longer assigned to the case. To insure that your pleadings are referred to the proper Judge and Magistrate Judge with as little delay as possible, please use the letter suffix KD-MU after the case number on all future pleadings. (meh) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #5 MOTION to Dismiss . Referred to Judge DuBose. (meh) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Brett W. Aaron on behalf of Arkyla Miller, Clarence L. Roberts (Aaron, Brett) |
|
MOTIONS REFERRED: #7 Joint MOTION for Leave to Take Deposition of Bentarious Stewart; Referred to Judge Katherine P. Nelson. (mab) |
Filing 7 Joint MOTION for Leave to Take Deposition of Bentarious Stewart, filed by Prime Insurance Company. (Oliver, Blake) |
|
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Prime Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Oliver, Blake) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #5 MOTION to Dismiss Referred to Judge Terry F. Moorer. (mab) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendant Prime Insurance Company. (Oliver, Blake) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Exhibits by Prime Insurance Company re: #1 Notice of Removal, (Oliver, Blake) |
Filing 2 Blank Disclosure Statement Form E-Mailed to Counsel for Defendant Prime Insurance Company; Disclosure Statement Due 7/6/2023. (tot) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 402, Receipt number AALSDC-3226659, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Prime Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D) (Oliver, Blake) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/29/2023: #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (fz). |
Answer due from Prime Insurance Company pursuant to FRCP 81(c)(2). (tot) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.