UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $27,300.00, More or Less, in U.S. Currency
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
$27,300.00, More or Less, in U.S. Currency |
Williams Ontivros-Maciel |
1:2023cv00321 |
August 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Terry F Moorer |
P Bradley Murray |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION to Strike Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Verified Complaint filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Vann, Gina) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #5 MOTION to Strike #3 Answer Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Verified Complaint Referred to Judge Terry F. Moorer. (mab) |
Filing 4 PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING ORDER entered. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/9/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 9/25/2023. (Attachment: #1 consent form) (mab) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Williams Ontiveros-Maciel re: $27,300.00, More or Less, in U.S. Currency. (Allgood, Megan) Modified on 9/25/2023 (mab). |
Filing 2 WARRANT of for Arrest of $27,300.00 More or Less in U.S. Currency issued to Plaintiff (mab) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Forfeiture in REM against $27,300.00, More or Less, in U.S. Currency, filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 11/20/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of Forfeiture, #3 Warrant for Arrest) (Vann, Gina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.