Giles v. Hamilton Home Builders, LLC et al
| Jacqueline Elizabeth Giles |
| Hamilton Home Builders, LLC, Regional Enterprises, LLC doing business as Regional Home Center of Mobile and 21st Mortgage Corporation |
| 1:2023cv00323 |
| August 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Kristi K DuBose |
| P Bradley Murray |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
ENDORSED ORDER granting Defendant Regional Enterprises, LLC's, D/B/A Regional Home Center of Mobile ("Regional"), #24 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply as to #23 Response to Motion. Regional's Reply shall by due by 11/3/2023. Signed by District Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 10/18/2023. (fwd)
|
| Filing 24 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #23 Response to Motion, filed by Regional Enterprises, LLC. (Little, Justin) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #24 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #23 Response to Motion. Referred to Judge DuBose. (meh) |
| REFERRAL OF #23 Response to Motion to Judge DuBose. (jmr) |
| Filing 23 RESPONSE to Motion re: #12 MOTION to Compel Arbitration by Defendant Regional Home Centers LLC, et al filed by Jacqueline Elizabeth Giles. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4) (Riemer, Kenneth) |
| Filing 22 REPLY to Response to Motion #6 TO DISMISS OR STAY AND COMPEL ARBITRATION filed by Hamilton Home Builders, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Construction Arbitration Rules Fact Sheet for Arbitrators Updated October 23, 2007, #2 Exhibit 2 - August 1, 2018 version of the AAA Home Construction Fact Sheet for Parties and Arbitrators) (Ritchey, Gregory) |
| REFERRAL OF #22 Reply to Response to Motion to Judge DuBose. (meh) |
|
Filing 21
ENDORSED ORDER granting #20 21st Century Mortgage Corporation's Unopposed Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint within fourteen (14) days after the Court's decision on the pending motions to compel arbitration. Signed by District Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 9/29/2023. (khc)
|
| Filing 20 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Defendant 21st Mortgage Corporation's Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by 21st Mortgage Corporation. (Lester, James) |
| REFERRAL OF #19 Response to Motion to Judge DuBose. (meh) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE to Motion re: #6 MOTION to Stay MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Jacqueline Elizabeth Giles. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 -Hamilton Warranty, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 Statement of Claims - AAA, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 Consumer Rules Fee Schedule, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4 05.01.23 Hamilton Objection letter, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5 05.16.23 Giles Objection, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 6 05.30.23 Hamilton letter, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 7 07.15.09 AAA Letter, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 8 06.16.23 AAA Email, #9 Exhibit Exhibit 9 Home Construction Fee Schedule, #10 Exhibit Exhibit 10 07.20.23 AAA Email, #11 Exhibit Exhibit 11 AAA Construction Industry Arbitration Fee Schedule, #12 Exhibit Exhibit 12 Giles Declaration, #13 Exhibit Exhibit 13 07.25.23 Email WD Claim, #14 Exhibit Exhibit 14 AAA Consumer Due Process Protocol) (Riemer, Kenneth) |
|
Filing 18
ENDORSED ORDER granting #17 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Plaintiff's response to Regional Home Centers LLC d/b/a Regional Home Center of Mobile Motion for Stay of Proceedings and to Compel Arbitration shall be due by 10/12/2023 and Defendant's Reply shall be due by 10/19/2023. Signed by District Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 9/20/23. (khc)
|
| Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Response to Regional Home Centers LLC d/b/a Regional Home Center of Mobile Motion for Stay of Proceedings and to Compel Arbitration filed by Jacqueline Elizabeth Giles. (Riemer, Kenneth) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #17 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Response to Regional Home Centers LLC d/b/a Regional Home Center of Mobile Motion for Stay of Proceedings and to Compel Arbitration. Referred to Judge Kristi K. DuBose. (jmr) |
| Filing 16 Document endorsed NOTED by District Judge Kristi K. DuBose: Corporate Disclosure Statement #2 filed by Regional Enterprises, LLC, Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 filed by Regional Enterprises, LLC, Corporate Disclosure Statement #7 filed by Hamilton Home Builders, LLC. Review of the corporate disclosure statements has been completed. The review did not reveal any reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest, which would require disqualification or recusal in this action. (khc) |
|
Filing 15
Order re: #12 MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Regional Enterprises, LLC. Plaintiff's Response to Motion due on or before 9/27/2023. Defendant Regional shall Reply by 10/4/2023. Signed by District Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 9/12/2023. (meh)
|
|
Filing 14
ENDORSED ORDER granting #13 Defendant 21st Mortgage Corporation's Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant 21st Mortgage shall, on or before September 29, 2023, answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Signed by District Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 9/12/2023. (khc)
|
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #6 MOTION to Stay MOTION to Compel Arbitration Referred to Judge Kristi K. DuBose. (jmr) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #12 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and #13 MOTION for Extension of Time DEFENDANT 21ST MORTGAGE CORPORATIONS UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT. Referred to Judge DuBose. (meh) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time DEFENDANT 21ST MORTGAGE CORPORATIONS UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT filed by 21st Mortgage Corporation. (Lester, James) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Regional Enterprises, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibits 1 and 2) (Little, Justin) |
|
Filing 11
ENDORSED ORDER granting #10 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension for Plaintiff to Respond to Defendant Hamilton Home Builders' Motion to Dismiss or Stay and Compel Arbitration. Plaintiff's response is due on or before September 27, 2023, and Defendants' reply is due on or before October 4, 2023. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 10/5/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 8/30/23. (lto)
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Defendant Hamilton Home Builders' Motion to Dismiss or Stay and Compel Arbitration filed by Jacqueline Elizabeth Giles. (Riemer, Kenneth) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Defendant Hamilton Home Builders' Motion to Dismiss or Stay and Compel Arbitration. Referred to Judge P. Bradley Murray. (meh) |
|
Filing 9
TEXT-ONLY ORDER: On August 24, 2023, Defendant Hamilton Home Builders, LLC, filed a Motion to Dismiss or Stay and Compel Arbitration. (Doc. 6). Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a response to Defendant's motion on or before September 7, 2023. Defendant is ORDERED to file its reply, if any, on or before September 14, 2023, at which time the Court will take the motion under submission. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray on 8/25/23. (lto)
|
| Filing 8 Document endorsed NOTED by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray: A review of the Disclosure Statement #7 filed by Defendant Hamilton Home Builders, LLC reveals no reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require disqualification or recusal in this action. (lto) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendant Hamilton Home Builders, LLC. (Ritchey, Gregory) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Stay , MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Hamilton Home Builders, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Affidavit, #2 Exhibit B - redacted invoice, #3 Exhibit C - Bill of Lading, #4 Exhibit D - Limited Warranty, #5 Exhibit E - Work Orders, #6 Exhibit F - Demand for Arbitration, #7 Exhibit G - Lt to AAA, #8 Exhibit H - 5-1-23 email from AAA, #9 Exhibit I - 6-16-23 email from AAA, #10 Exhibit J - 7-25-23 email from AAA closing file) (Ritchey, Gregory) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #6 MOTION to Stay MOTION to Compel Arbitration . Referred to Judge P. Bradley Murray. (meh) |
| Filing 5 Document endorsed NOTED by Magistrate Judge P. Bradley Murray: A review of the Disclosure Statement #2 filed by Regional Enterprises, LLC, and the Disclosure Statement #3 filed by Regional Enterprises of AL, LLC reveals no reason to believe that there are potential conflicts of interest that would require disqualification or recusal in this action. (lto) |
| Filing 4 Answer due from All Defendants pursuant to FRCP 81(c). (meh) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendant Regional Enterprises, LLC. (Little, Justin) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendants Regional Enterprises, LLC, Regional Holdings Corp. identifying Corporate Parent Regional Holdings Corp. for Regional Enterprises, LLC.. (Little, Justin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 402, Receipt number AALSDC-3257948, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Regional Enterprises, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Little, Justin) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/23/2023: #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jmr). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
